A clear comparison of ZWB and ZWC — holdings, yield, diversification, fees. Updated 2026.
Informational only. Not investment advice.
| ETF | Holdings | Covered Calls? | Distributions | Diversification |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ZWB | Canadian big banks | Yes (~50%) | Monthly | Low — banks only |
| ZWC | Broad Canadian high-dividend | Yes | Monthly | Medium — multi-sector |
| ZEB | Canadian big banks, no calls | No | Monthly | Low — banks only |
| Feature | ZWB | ZWC | ZEB |
|---|---|---|---|
| Approx. yield (2026) | ~6.5–7% | ~5.6–5.7% | ~2.6% |
| MER (approx.) | ~0.72% | ~0.72% | ~0.28% |
| Upside participation | Partially capped | Partially capped | Full |
| Sector concentration | High (banks only) | Lower (multi-sector) | High (banks only) |
ZEB holds the same banks as ZWB but without covered calls. More upside, lower yield (~2.6%), lower MER (~0.28% vs ~0.72%). Better for long-term growth-oriented investors.
ZWB or ZWC work well. Monthly distributions are tax-free in a TFSA.
ZEB might suit better — lower fees, full upside, bank dividends reinvested for 20 years compounds significantly.
ZWC — spreads across financials, energy, utilities, telecoms with covered-call overlay.
Yes. Some investors hold both for bank concentration (ZWB) plus broader exposure (ZWC). Be aware of financial sector overlap.
Both trade on TSX. See our broker comparison for low-fee options.